“Islamist extremism will be to the 21st century what fascism and communism were to the 20th century.” -- Thomas Quiggin et al., Submission: The Danger of Political Islam to Canada.
Globalists such as Justin Trudeau would like to fill the West with people who will help to create a vast dictatorship, where the main population consists of uneducated people accustomed to autocracy, and where the dissidents are reduced in numbers, taught to be ashamed of their own culture, and brainwashed into a belief in what is euphemistically called multiculturalism. Ultimately this so-called multiculturalism means a world of no culture at all -- a world of no values, no pride, no self-respect, no past, and no future, only obedience.
Tens of thousands of “Syrian refugees” have already been brought into Canada by Trudeau, and many more will be coming. Most do not speak English, most are not employable, and most are Muslim. And why is no Muslim country willing to take these people?
Canada already has serious problems of unemployment and poverty, and our health-care system is rated 30th by the World Health Organization, yet Trudeau spends vast amounts of money on such questionable issues as his so-called humanitarianism -- more accurately referred to as “grabbing the ethnic vote.” The total expected cost of bringing in these Syrians is said to be about a billion dollars, though the real figure may be more like 3 billion. And of course Syrians are not the only Muslims coming into Canada.
Canada has the world’s highest overall rate of immigration. It also has the world’s fastest growing Muslim population. Yet most of Canada is barren land, not suitable for further growth in population of any sort.
Attacks by Muslims on the inhabitants of Western countries, including Canada, have been frequent and violent for years, and many innocent people have been murdered. The politicians and the news-media obscure the issues by referring to the attackers as “terrorists.” They are not just “terrorists,” they are, quite specifically, Muslims.
It is also highly misleading to say there are “good” Muslims and “bad” Muslims. Muslims have spent 14 centuries trying to conquer the West, as they were ordered to do by their prophet Mohammed. Much of the Koran, the Muslim holy book, is devoted to telling the faithful, in quite violent language, that they must conquer the “infidels.” Muslims are even cruel to one another: every year, about 20,000 Muslim women are victims of “honor killings” -- murdered by their own families.
I’ve read the Koran from cover to cover twice over the years. The biggest problem is the boredom factor -- how to stay awake through it all. Well, admittedly, and thank God (Allah), it’s quite a short book. But the violence and sheer nastiness of the book is something that people need to know about.
Islam has nearly always been “spread by the sword.” The slave trade, throughout the Middle East and Europe, was very much dominated by Muslims for centuries. Muslim treatment of women has always been atrocious. Individual Muslim empires, such as that of the Ottomans, were famous for their cruelty. And so on.
Disinformation is a fascinating but malignant form of psychological warfare. It is said to have been perfected by the KGB. Disinformation, as a political tactic, is now as common as tying one’s shoes. The basic process is to take a genuine fact, and then to tweak (twist) it, just a tiny bit, not too noticeably, but enough to produce the desire effect.
One thing I’ve noticed about most Canadians, unfortunately, is that they’ll talk for hours nonstop about all the ways we should change the world -- but as soon as you ask them to do something tangible, they give you a silly grin, then get red-faced and sweaty and tell you they’re going to be rather busy sorting out their socks and underwear.
Forming a political group of an appropriate sort would be a start -- a very small start. But it would have to be a group that actually sits down at a real table and drinks real coffee, instead of just sending email back and forth. One catch is that, except in big cities, we’re all so dispersed as Canadians -- across 10 million square kilometres. A bigger catch is that Canadians can never agree on anything.
As the darkness descends, the main liveable parts of Canada will be parts of the Prairies, parts of Ontario, and parts of the Maritimes. My favourite Maritime province is Newfoundland. It’s possible to drive there for hours without seeing another human being. I still might end up there. I may not see many humans, but perhaps not many Muslims as well. It’s unfortunate I got into a disagreement by email with the owners of a B&B over the entry of Muslims into Newfoundland, so that I might not be welcome anymore in that particular town.
I was shocked when, beginning in 2015, Angela Merkel started letting over a million Muslims into Germany. I had a German woman friend there, an accountant, and she couldn’t understand why Merkel bothered me. I finally realized that my friend was quite excited about the idea of a united (borderless) Europe and all the great business it would bring in. I still have German friends, but I crossed her off my list.
But at least Germany has PEGIDA, the Identitarian Movement and Alternative für Deutschland, in spite of all the strict “anti-Nazi” laws, so I don’t know what to say about my fellow Canadians. Canada may well be the one nation that will welcome the dissolution of its historical identity, coupled with Islamization, without a fight other than grumblings by white Canadians about how bad things are getting.
It’s insulting to be living in a country where one can be charged with an infringement of multicultural rights, or religious rights, or any of the other nonsense that’s been incorporated into law since 1971 -- that’s the date when Justin’s daddy was starting to foist all that stuff onto the Canadian public. -- And almost nobody realized then what monsters Pierre was letting loose, what an insult it all was in terms of common law.
Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn are two who got hauled in front of tribunals. So the question is always: Is anyone free from this kind of treatment? Offhand, I can’t think of a single MP who would lift a finger to help, except in the disingenuous manner displayed by a few politicians I could name.
I wonder, however, whether it might not be better to deal with all this nonsense in a more direct manner. In other words, just say no to all the Iqra Khalids, instead of trying to engage them in an ivory-tower discussion, debating legalistic minutiae that they themselves don’t take seriously.
At the same time, I rather despair that there are any democratic solutions. To fight the Liberals, there is no party worthy of the name, not even some little “survivalist” type of gang off in the hills somewhere. All we have as our defenders are the Conservatives, utterly devoid of principles or even ideas.
I often get the feeling I’m caught in a strange dream world. I recall the TV program The Prisoner, starring Patrick McGoohan, back in the 60s. He was always trying to escape from the island, but giant beach-balls always brought him back, after he’d get tired of being silly.
But there are many other parallels -- situations in which one is being slowly driven insane by one’s custodians. Alice in Wonderland. The Stasi in East Germany. Kafka, The Trial. The movie The Matrix. I mean situations where, in order to win (or just survive?) you have to tell yourself, every morning, that you yourself are sane, and it’s your tormentors who are insane. I mean, how can anyone look at pictures of Justin Trudeau’s face and honestly say that he is really the prime minister of this country, in the sense that the title was used for the last 150 years? It’s all total madness.
“Bush’s war in Iraq created ISIS.”
The problem with this statement (which I hear often), is that it becomes a device for “disinformation” (vs “misinformation”) -- i.e. it is a partial truth that is then twisted so that if becomes interpreted in a form which is in fact very much an “un-truth.”
In other words, someone (gullible enough) listening to the statement, “Bush’s war in Iraq created ISIS,” then assumes that it means, “There is nothing inherently cruel in Muslim life, there is only the cruelty that dates from Bush’s war in Iraq.”
But of course this is quite false. Muslim cruelty dates back 14 centuries, right to its beginnings. Islam has nearly always been “spread by the sword.” The slave trade, throughout the Middle East and Europe, was very much dominated by Muslims for centuries. Muslim treatment of women has always been atrocious. Individual Muslim empires, such as that of the Ottomans, were famous for their cruelty. And so on. All of this was long before the intervention of Americans.
Television news reporting uses disinformation constantly: “Police brutally assaulted and killed an innocent [whatever] . . . ,” omitting the fact that the “innocent” person in question was committing an act of violence and then tried shooting his way out of the arrest.
Psychological warfare does not take place always during a state of “war” in the usual sense. Every day, there is a war on the human mind, and the aggressor is often a government acting against its own citizens.
Justin Trudeau, unlike his father, is primarily a Muslim, not a Marxist. Most political parties and politicians in the Western world are clearly favoring the mass immigration of Muslims, even though the result is the devastation of the country that is being invaded. Canada, of course, has the world’s fastest-growing Muslim population, and I hate to imagine the fate of today’s children if Shirley Temple (sorry, Iqra Khalid) and her friends are not stopped. Neither of our two major parties is willing to say a word, since any form of opposition would be suicide -- political or otherwise.
Marxism, on the other hand, is a (truly regrettable) part of our Western legacy, but as an ideology it is fading almost everywhere. As for the form known as cultural Marxism, although I have studied it myself, I’m willing to consider what the deniers often say, that it’s such an obscure entity that demonstrating its very existence is somewhat problematic, depending largely on how one shuffles the evidence -- there’s too much cherry-picking of a few rather fading documents.
Islam has been waiting 1,400 years for this final capitulation.
To find who is really “oppressing white people,” we don’t need to look at cultural Marxism, or the One World Order. We need to look in the mirror. White people have degenerated, and they have no one to blame but themselves. They are physically, emotionally, and morally inferior to their ancestors. They excel only in such things as obesity, alcoholism, and divorce. White men today would be unable to defend themselves or their families in any serious confict. Everything that white people have is therefore ripe for the picking.
One day in Oman I received phone call asking me to come downstairs and talk to a young Dutch woman named Alison, who had arrived in the country a few days before. She had come to Oman to meet her “boyfriend,” an Omani soldier. She had some rather vague questions about “safety.” She also had some reservations about this man she was about to meet. I tried to explain the need for caution, but I didn’t want to be guilty of fear-mongering. I tried to answer her questions without either terrifying her, so that she would just shut out whatever I said, or toning down the facts so much that she learned nothing, remaining as naive as her parents raised her to be.
The next day, she was taken out to a wadi (dry riverbed) by her “boyfriend,” his brother, and a third man. They spent several hours gang-raping her in every possible way. I spent most of the following day trying in my clumsy fashion to counsel her. Whenever I wanted to break off the conversation, which merely went around in circles, she whispered that she didn’t want to be left alone. I tried to explain to her, without drifting into academic nonsense, that this was a patriarchal culture, essentially a “warrior” culture, still a world of warfare among bands and villages. This was a culture that had stopped evolving many centuries ago, and its view of women as cattle or chattel was fixed.
I also tried to explain to Alison that Oman was a culture devoid of love in the Western sense. One of the strands of Christianity was the “invention” of the concept of love, as in “faith, hope, and charity,” with “charity” a translation of caritas, which in turn is a Latin translation of the Greek term agape (versus eros).
In Oman it’s not easy to deal with the police, but I managed to communicate with them through intermediaries. Over the next few days, I made some enquiries, but I discovered that the police weren’t interested. Their basic message was that she wasn’t a Muslim, she hadn’t had her head covered, and she hadn’t been with a male relative. End of story.
I realized later that the police would certainly have done nothing, and there had been no point even in asking them. A “devil-worshiper” foreign woman can never expect much help. Western women in taxis were sometimes groped by the drivers, but whenever I had tried to warn them they generally thought I was exaggerating.
Democracy will not save the West. Struggling to win battles within mainstream political parties is a waste of breath. Whatever we may believe, they aren’t our friends, and they don’t want us playing golf with them.
The alternative to playing the democracy game, therefore, is separatism. This has a long history, and there is plenty to study. If we don’t mind observing the enemy, we can read Che Guevara’s Guerilla Warfare, which is more suited to a largely peasant agricultural society but does have some gems of wisdom regarding such matters as how a David can defeat a Goliath. We should also consider the fact that everything Adolf Hitler and Mao Zedong did involved separating from the established parties, whether or not we agree with their morality or their goals. We can also consider the separatist movement in Quebec. Or we can look at the history of the Doukhobors in western Canada.
“Revolution,” legal or otherwise, although a great fantasy, cannot readily be initiated in the modern world, at least not without a few intermediate steps. It’s like a flea trying to have sex with an elephant. The Suidlanders’ idea (in South Africa) is much better. Their plan, in a sense, is to “make” their own country -- to carve out a part of South Africa and make it an independent (or basically independent) country. It’s an excellent idea, and they’ve already made progress. But their approach is not at all like that of California rich kids, trying to impress one another with cool jargon about “virtue signalling” and other pathetic verbal crap. The Suidlanders’ approach is “survival.” Learn how to stay alive. Learn how to defend yourself. Learn how to communicate. Learn how to bring friends and families together.
The bad guys will try to get you through Google. When your computer starts playing funny tricks, it won’t be quite as funny as you think. Remember that the main function of “social media” is to get you to waste your energy in blowing off hot air. Remember that computers were invented by the Devil. But take courage: the use of electricity worldwide rises faster than the production of energy, which means there will be massive blackouts in the years to come.
If you were never a member of the Scouts, or you’ve scrubbed that portion of your brain for what you thought were more practical uses, you probably don’t know how to tie a few basic knots, or how to light a campfire with one match on a rainy day. Learn.